Cookies and ads

We use cookies to make the site work and — with your consent — for Google ads and visit statistics. You can accept all, decline the optional ones, or choose in detail.

LocalTrader
Log in
Back to blog
Case study: How comparing construction quotes saved an investor thousands
Published 17/10/2026 1 min readTrust & safety

Case study: How comparing construction quotes saved an investor thousands

The story of an investor who set a maximum budget and enabled auto-rejection for quotes — and why getting 6 bids instead of 1 was the most cost-effective decision in the entire project.

An investor was building a house near Warsaw. Budget: £170,000; maximum amount set in the project request: £176,000. Instead of calling just one well-known crew, he published his request with auto-rejection for quotes above his maximum budget enabled.

What happened

  • Out of 9 quotes, 3 exceeded the maximum — the system marked them as rejected.
  • The remaining 6 varied by… £36,000 for the exact same scope of work.
  • The cheapest quote (£138,000) came from a company with 5 years of experience and valid certifications — not from some "fly-by-night operator with an unreal price."
  • The investor put the savings toward photovoltaics and a fence.

Conclusions from the case study

  • Price variance is the norm, not the exception — a 20–30% difference is standard for the same scope.
  • Setting a maximum amount protects you from pointless negotiations.
  • A quote outside your budget isn't necessarily "bad" — it's simply not the right fit for you.

Spend 10 minutes creating a high-quality job post instead of 10 days on the phone — post yours on LocalTrader.

Looking for a reliable crew?

Publish your job for free and get offers from verified construction companies.

Publish a job

Related posts